4 ms·
It strike me as a bit punitive that only Mac App Store applications are permitted to access iCloud and is probably a barrier to further adoption of iCloud by de
by jimmcslim 12y ago
It strike me as a bit punitive that only Mac App Store applications are permitted to access iCloud and is probably a barrier to further adoption of iCloud by developers; particularly in light of the fact that there are certain legitimate classes of app for which the sandboxing restrictions have egregious impacts on a user's workflow.
Consequently developers are forced to implement their own sync solutions (e.g. Panic Sync, and Omigroup's OmniSync) - which can be a hard component to get right and increases the overall attack surface of the application + its server-side sync solution. Or rely on Dropbox, etc which I'm sure Panic had good reasons to avoid (most likely 3rd-party vendor lock-in).
Hopefully the WWDC will show Apple being more accommodating on this front, but I won't hold my breath.
- cageface 12y agoApple's refusal to even consider making their cloud services cross-platform is already a very serious limiting factor in their adoption. Requiring these extremely restrictive sandboxing controls might very well turn out to be the final nail in iCloud's coffin.
- astrange 12y agoWhich cloud services? http://support.apple.com/kb/dl1455 http://support.apple.com/kb/dl1455 iTunes is another large cloud service which is cross-platform.
- ryanobjc 12y agoWell, considering the low quality of iCloud, no real loss.