2 ms·
It may be wrong, but is it, perhaps, a harmless and useful way to understand Haskell? (I have a friend who always tries to show me examples of neat stuff he's
by melloclello 12y ago
It may be wrong, but is it, perhaps, a harmless and useful way to understand Haskell?
(I have a friend who always tries to show me examples of neat stuff he's done in Haskell and I can never wrap my brain about it)
- aaronblohowiak 12y agoWhen discussing technical matters, anything that isn't technically correct should be accompanied by a disclaimer. I usually like to say "just about", "informally" or "while there are some exceptions, it can be helpful to think about it as if..."
- omaranto 12y agoIt's not useful at all, it makes Haskell sound bizarre. Haskell is much more of an ordinary programming language than this would suggest: like ordinary languages it has functions but also numbers, strings, list, arrays, etc.