5 ms·
The New AWS TCO Calculator
- dewey 12y agoDirect link to the calculator in case you just want to play around with it: http://awstcocalculator.com/ http://awstcocalculator.com/
- ChuckMcM 12y agoThanks for that. Nice that the costs are getting closer, I only have to pay an extra million dollars a year to host my crawling and indexing infrastructure in the cloud than to co-locate it by their calc. It would still be impossible to get the latency I want but that the hardware cost difference is down to around 20% is a huge improvement.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- gaadd33 12y agoThis doesn't seem useful if you are pricing out anything less than a full (or multiple) racks of servers. For 2 servers with moderate specs (8 cores total, 16gb each) it claims the 3 year cost will be $120K. Most of that seems to be due to the assumption that 2U requires a full rack costing $30K up front plus $2.5K/mo in datacenter costs.
- ceejayoz 12y agoYeah. It really should just error out with a "sorry, the TCO calculator is only intended for 1+ full racks" or something along those lines.
- peterwwillis 12y agoI do believe that's the market they're going after. Most people don't calculate TCO unless they're an enterprise looking at buying/managing their own gear, which would include racks.
- pbnjay 12y agoCame here to say the same. I also love that they assume 15%/year maintenance even for the first year of colocation!
- jauer 12y agoYeah. This is going to be a great sales tool for when little shops ask why they should buy a 1/4 cabinet from me instead of going to AWS.
- opendais 12y agoIt is just a marketing tool. They conveniently leave out the 'real' competition which is 50%+ utilization on dedicated server providers. Consistent performance, significantly cheaper.
- benologist 12y agoBit convenient to overlook regular dedicated servers that you can rent from a bajillion hosting companes, again.
- ChuckMcM 12y agoActually the calculator can do that, but badly. You need to go in and delete out the 'rack' cost which is typically built in with most Colocation deals.
- opendais 12y agoThe pricing is still waaaaaaaaaaaaay off. They intentionally left it out because anyone with high utilization would find the dedicated servers cheaper.
- Fizzadar 12y agoObviously completely biased. Well utilised hardware or dedicated servers can easily compete (and blow out of the water at cheaper DC's) on price with AWS (and then you actually get guaranteed resources).
- dice 12y agoTheir comparison sizes for instances versus physical machines is laughable. For a 12 core physical machine with 64GB of RAM they list the r3.2xlarge instance size as unit-for-unit comparable (10 instances versus 10 machines I had configured). Yeah... no. 8 vCPUs are nowhere near as fast as a pair of 6 core Xeons. My rule of thumb in AWS is that you get about half of what they say you do: so an 8 vCPU instance has about as much power as a 4 core physical server. And don't even get me started on what they have for hardware costs. I think they must have pulled list price from Dell or something. I can get prices about 2/3 to 1/2 of what they're listing from my VAR.
- coldcode 12y agoYou might get more useful numbers by asking random questions of Mechanical Turk. TCO estimation is mostly pointless.