4 ms·

Too little? Biggest change for ASP.NET from release of ASP.NET! "Too much of pain" was the first (and last) thing I said when trying to configure ruby on ubunt

by hudo 12y ago

Too little? Biggest change for ASP.NET from release of ASP.NET! "Too much of pain" was the first (and last) thing I said when trying to configure ruby on ubuntu. Or tried to download some app and run it.

hockeybias 12y ago
Hear, hear!
gretful 12y ago
same thing I said when trying to convert to .Net. Ruby on Ubuntu? easy peasy.
lucidquiet 12y ago
I guess all those thousands of Rails apps running on Ubuntu had some kind of magic or secret knowledge to get that working. Going open source and posting some libs on Github is 'Huge'? That's kind of funny considering how much is out there, top notch, and did it way before MS did, and yet, it wasn't "huge" for them.
- jf22 12y ago
  Its huge because MS has never embraced open source like they are now. Flying cars would be pretty huge even though planes have already been flying for a while...
mkaziz 12y ago
I think Hudo's point is that experience with technologies is subjective. I loathe Windows after having been comfortable in terminal, and I loathe Eclipse after having been comfortable in VS.
- lucidquiet 12y ago
  I've gotten apps working on .net and ubuntu -- configuration was a drag in both, but it works, and isn't the entire basis for loving or hating a platform. So what I'm saying is I agree with your comment. The catch here (and point) is why should you have to switch from VS at all? If it's a real source code editor shouldn't it handle Java, Clojure, Haskell, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc all just fine? Some of the oldest and free editors do and do it well. I realize MS has an agenda (perhaps) or they've de-prioritized any of these features into oblivion -- but who are they serving, I certainly didn't feel it was me even after giving them a lot of $ for VS.
  - us0r 12y ago
    " If it's a real source code editor shouldn't it handle Java, Clojure, Haskell, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc all just fine?" http://pytools.codeplex.com/ http://pytools.codeplex.com/ http://nodejstools.codeplex.com/ http://nodejstools.codeplex.com/ They have others but you get the idea.
  - uvTwitch 12y ago
    Other editors certainly 'do it', but they're so embarassingly bad that a huge amount of non-VS devs resort to using text editors instead of dealing with the clunky IDEs.
ossreality 12y ago
Really? `sudo apt-get install ruby` was too much for you? You just make yourself sound dumb when you say shit like that.

by hudo 12y ago

hockeybias 12y ago

Hear, hear!

gretful 12y ago

same thing I said when trying to convert to .Net. Ruby on Ubuntu? easy peasy.

lucidquiet 12y ago

I guess all those thousands of Rails apps running on Ubuntu had some kind of magic or secret knowledge to get that working. Going open source and posting some libs on Github is 'Huge'? That's kind of funny considering how much is out there, top notch, and did it way before MS did, and yet, it wasn't "huge" for them.

jf22 12y ago
Its huge because MS has never embraced open source like they are now. Flying cars would be pretty huge even though planes have already been flying for a while...

mkaziz 12y ago

I think Hudo's point is that experience with technologies is subjective. I loathe Windows after having been comfortable in terminal, and I loathe Eclipse after having been comfortable in VS.

lucidquiet 12y ago
I've gotten apps working on .net and ubuntu -- configuration was a drag in both, but it works, and isn't the entire basis for loving or hating a platform. So what I'm saying is I agree with your comment. The catch here (and point) is why should you have to switch from VS at all? If it's a real source code editor shouldn't it handle Java, Clojure, Haskell, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc all just fine? Some of the oldest and free editors do and do it well. I realize MS has an agenda (perhaps) or they've de-prioritized any of these features into oblivion -- but who are they serving, I certainly didn't feel it was me even after giving them a lot of $ for VS.
- us0r 12y ago
  " If it's a real source code editor shouldn't it handle Java, Clojure, Haskell, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc all just fine?" http://pytools.codeplex.com/ http://pytools.codeplex.com/ http://nodejstools.codeplex.com/ http://nodejstools.codeplex.com/ They have others but you get the idea.
- uvTwitch 12y ago
  Other editors certainly 'do it', but they're so embarassingly bad that a huge amount of non-VS devs resort to using text editors instead of dealing with the clunky IDEs.

ossreality 12y ago

Really? `sudo apt-get install ruby` was too much for you? You just make yourself sound dumb when you say shit like that.