Again: read the claims. From a quick glance, it seems a single flexible screen is used within a case, and the same screen presents the main display as well as t

Again: read the claims. From a quick glance, it seems a single flexible screen is used within a case, and the same screen presents the main display as well as the side display through a window in the side of the case (presumably the flexible display is bent at the sides.) That seems like an interesting approach I have not seen discussed before, and I can see some advantages (fewer components at the cost of potentially wasted screen real estate.) Also, that should make moot the discussions so far on this thread about fragility of the design and validity of this patent.