3 ms·
Also, on top of being cumulative and using different periods, the chart just directly visually lies. The pixel height difference between the 78.2 and 148.8 bar
by Strilanc 12y ago
Also, on top of being cumulative and using different periods, the chart just directly visually lies.
The pixel height difference between the 78.2 and 148.8 bars is ~110px for 70.6B$. But between 148.8 and 210 it's 198px for 61.2B.
So the pixel difference increases despite the money difference decreasing. I have no idea how this can be justified. It makes the right side of the chart look more steep than the rest instead of less (except the left-most part).
- Strilanc 12y agoThey dabble in scaling 2-dimensional objects by radius instead of the area, but not quite by radius. A ~40% (cumulative) increase in dollars is shown as a ~70% increase in pixel area (which is a ~30% increase in radius, not ~40%).