3 ms·
> Yes it does. The UTF-8/16/32 encodings are defined in the Unicode standard (chapter 3.9, page 89), they're not some kind of aftermarket add-on. Fair enough,
by ninkendo 13y ago
> Yes it does. The UTF-8/16/32 encodings are defined in the Unicode standard (chapter 3.9, page 89), they're not some kind of aftermarket add-on.
Fair enough, but would you not agree that the word is overloaded? The fact that a few encodings are listed in the Unicode standard doesn't make it ok to wave your hand and call it all "Unicode" in essays like these where it very much matters what actual encoding you're talking about. If you mean UTF-8, stay UTF-8, etc.