7 ms·
OK, I'll bite: This is from [2010], so rather old. What changed to make this relevant now?
by unwind 13y ago
OK, I'll bite: This is from [2010], so rather old.
What changed to make this relevant now?
- philliproso 13y agoI think it's because some people are finally considering making pure python3 projects.
- saurik 13y agoNo: this is from 2006; it was last modified in 2010, but the changes were negligible (a wording tweak), and earlier changes were even less important (updating hyperlinks).
- _pmf_ 13y ago> What changed to make this relevant now? Python is increasingly losing ground to the new "it"-languages. To stay relevant, it needs cryptic syntax of dubious value so bloggers can write lengthy articles about useless applications for this new feature.
- coldtea 13y agoYou can say the same for Algol or Cobol. But then the stupidity of the statement would be immediately apparent.
- threatofrain 13y agoWhat examples do you have (Go?), and do you have any charts that you drew insight from to say that? Of course, I have already been Googling the issue, but we aren't necessarily looking at the same sources. So where are you getting your information that Python is losing to the "it" languages?