I reread it and I don't see where you're coming from. I agree with your impossibility statement; that's why I said it's ironic that Unix tries to be all things

I reread it and I don't see where you're coming from. I agree with your impossibility statement; that's why I said it's ironic that Unix tries to be all things for all people, despite its philosophy. And why is FreeBSD it? Is there a quick, convincing pamphlet that can help answer this question? I keep hearing it but have never seen the reasons distilled, other than "it's more secure".