Are you really suggesting that not even 0.1% people are willing to support the rest if they can? Are you really saying that we're such moral monsters that not

Are you really suggesting that not even 0.1% people are willing to support the rest if they can? Are you really saying that we're such moral monsters that not even 0.1% of the population wouldn't help 1000 people if they could? Besides, with such a ratio, we could have a more equitable repartition: such as, having, say, 10% of the people volunteering a hundredth of their time to support the system. Do you really believe that if it was possible, it wouldn't be done anyway? Such cynicism on steroids would be ludicrous. Did I miss something?