It makes perfect sense. You still need goods and services you have nowhere near the consumption habits or total required by individuals working in steady, paid

It makes perfect sense. You still need goods and services you have nowhere near the consumption habits or total required by individuals working in steady, paid employment. The majority of entrepreneurs have precious little time for broadcast media, socialising, reading for pleasure or other time-filling habit. Major purchasing decisions such as housing, vehicles and children are drastically affected and often delayed by entrepreneurs. Such purchases may even find themselves mortgaged if funds are tight. (Hopefully not the children...) Where would the purchasing power stem from in a world of bootstrapping entrepreneurs? I am struggling to find any rational reason why you think B does make sense... You can challenge the validity with data but claiming it is does not make sense is fallacious.