3 ms·

This is a program named after a feature. Doesn't really do a good job of conveying what it's for IMO. Also since it uses the AGPL it's a no-go for me.

jbaiter 13y ago
Why is software licensed under the AGPL a no-go for you?
rabino 13y ago
Just curious, why is that? Why AGPL would prevent you from using this?
- benatkin 13y ago
  The ugliness in the WordPress community over themes and plugins. http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/825/getting-pretty-lonely http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/825/getting-pretty-lonely
  - orthecreedence 13y ago
    I don't see how themes/plugins have anything to do with an (A)GPL licensed end-user application that doesn't support any sort of plugins (at least not to my knowledge). Even if you did write plugins for apps and license/sell them, that would stop you from using a useful app just because you couldn't do it for that app? I'm having a hard time following how AGPL affects you as a user of the app, not someone who's selling addons for it and not as someone who provides the app over a network. It seems you could modify the source and run your own version without releasing your modifications and without violating the (A)GPL.
    - benatkin 13y ago
      1. This type of app just cries out for plugins. 2. Yes, because I don't want to spend time learning a system that I can't extend if extending systems is my livelihood. 3. I don't want to support a community that shuns people who disagree about licensing. 4. This feels against the spirit of open source to me, to avoid having people use code, and provide feedback. I don't believe that anyone understands the GPL including its creators. Too many things in it are vague.
      - belorn 13y ago
        GPL: Do whatever but the work is to never have restrictions added. AGPL: Anyone using/visiting the service need to have access to the source code. They are very simple. The only reason people can be confused by those two is FUD, and lawyers who find such statements too simplistic.
    - belorn 13y ago
      Yes, you can modify and run versions privately without having to release source code. The AGPL want that anyone who uses a service also have access to the source code. If one runs a modified AGPL service that only one person have access to, then the set of people who need to have access to the source code is that one.
  - rabino 13y ago
    Don't over fixate in a single data point. I give my family a pretty good life thanks to that WordPress community, and all my colleagues do too. Both in the services and products space. That "ugliness" you mention has worked really well for my career and I know more people that think the same than people that think the opposite.

jbaiter 13y ago

Why is software licensed under the AGPL a no-go for you?

rabino 13y ago

Just curious, why is that? Why AGPL would prevent you from using this?

benatkin 13y ago
The ugliness in the WordPress community over themes and plugins. http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/825/getting-pretty-lonely http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/825/getting-pretty-lonely
- orthecreedence 13y ago
  I don't see how themes/plugins have anything to do with an (A)GPL licensed end-user application that doesn't support any sort of plugins (at least not to my knowledge). Even if you did write plugins for apps and license/sell them, that would stop you from using a useful app just because you couldn't do it for that app? I'm having a hard time following how AGPL affects you as a user of the app, not someone who's selling addons for it and not as someone who provides the app over a network. It seems you could modify the source and run your own version without releasing your modifications and without violating the (A)GPL.
  - benatkin 13y ago
    1. This type of app just cries out for plugins. 2. Yes, because I don't want to spend time learning a system that I can't extend if extending systems is my livelihood. 3. I don't want to support a community that shuns people who disagree about licensing. 4. This feels against the spirit of open source to me, to avoid having people use code, and provide feedback. I don't believe that anyone understands the GPL including its creators. Too many things in it are vague.
    - belorn 13y ago
      GPL: Do whatever but the work is to never have restrictions added. AGPL: Anyone using/visiting the service need to have access to the source code. They are very simple. The only reason people can be confused by those two is FUD, and lawyers who find such statements too simplistic.
  - belorn 13y ago
    Yes, you can modify and run versions privately without having to release source code. The AGPL want that anyone who uses a service also have access to the source code. If one runs a modified AGPL service that only one person have access to, then the set of people who need to have access to the source code is that one.
- rabino 13y ago
  Don't over fixate in a single data point. I give my family a pretty good life thanks to that WordPress community, and all my colleagues do too. Both in the services and products space. That "ugliness" you mention has worked really well for my career and I know more people that think the same than people that think the opposite.