3 ms·
Methinks this guy sounds just a little too enthusiastic to embrace the BANNED BY APPLE! label. He and his publisher appear to have gotten a couple of very unhap
by mechanical_fish 17y ago
Methinks this guy sounds just a little too enthusiastic to embrace the BANNED BY APPLE! label. He and his publisher appear to have gotten a couple of very unhappy phone calls from Apple PR. Is that news, at this point? Isn't that rather more DOG BITES MAN than the other way around?
Wake me up when the lawsuit is filed. (And, given the relatively pitiful requirements for a libel lawsuit in the UK -- bless you, authors of the First Amendment -- even that might barely be news.)
Apple under Jobs is a secretive company, but the sight of so many ghouls counting the days until Steve Jobs' death has made it easy to empathize with his desire to tell celebrity journalists, in no uncertain terms, to piss off.
- bliving 17y agoA journalist? Too "enthusiastic"? Huh. You're right of course, but a dirt-digging, speculative, news-free 4000 word article has got to attract some advertising viewers somehow. I want to believe "Newspapers are the walking dead" when I waste my time with this. But yet, here we are, increasing their viewership...