3 ms·

First, bullshit. Here's one on the front page right now: https://github.com/simon-weber/Unofficial-Google-Music-API https://github.com/simon-weber/Unofficial-Go

First, bullshit. Here's one on the front page right now: https://github.com/simon-weber/Unofficial-Google-Music-API https://github.com/simon-weber/Unofficial-Google-Music-API Do you think this is a licensed API? Your "nobody will sue tiny projects" thought is contravened by history. Here's one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobsen_v._Katzer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobsen_v._Katzer We'll strongly disagree as to where this decision will lead. Thankfully, I know i'm not the only one worried. Also, fosspatents is not a legal decision, nor did you actually cite anything that backs up your claim: Your claim was the decision says the language was not copyrightable. It says no such thing. What it says is "It is undisputed that the Java programming language is open and free for anyone to use." This is because it was licensed, not because it is uncopyrightable.

pron 13y ago
That project doesn't clone an API. It uses one. It might be violating TOS, but not copyright. I didn't know about the Katzer case, but I still see no danger to the FOSS community and ecosystem by the new ruling. All it would do is require developers to clearly specify the license for their APIs. Cloning of proprietary APIs is most certainly not a cornerstone of FOSS today (unless, that is, Linux is in actual danger, in which case I'll change my position).
- DannyBee 13y ago
  Actually, it both uses one and clones one :) "Cloning of proprietary APIs is most certainly not a cornerstone of FOSS today (unless, that is, Linux is in actual danger, in which case I'll change my position)." I would disagree, but I can't say more, sadly.
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
- Nullabillity 13y ago
  Wouldn't this break Wine?
spacemanmatt 13y ago
fosspatents is run by a (paid) Microsoft shill. He calls himself an IP pundit or something. Groklaw basically outed him before he owned up to being on Microsoft's payroll publicly. He is loyal to his employer but his analysis and projections are often contradicted by facts.

pron 13y ago

That project doesn't clone an API. It uses one. It might be violating TOS, but not copyright. I didn't know about the Katzer case, but I still see no danger to the FOSS community and ecosystem by the new ruling. All it would do is require developers to clearly specify the license for their APIs. Cloning of proprietary APIs is most certainly not a cornerstone of FOSS today (unless, that is, Linux is in actual danger, in which case I'll change my position).

DannyBee 13y ago
Actually, it both uses one and clones one :) "Cloning of proprietary APIs is most certainly not a cornerstone of FOSS today (unless, that is, Linux is in actual danger, in which case I'll change my position)." I would disagree, but I can't say more, sadly.
deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
Nullabillity 13y ago
Wouldn't this break Wine?

spacemanmatt 13y ago

fosspatents is run by a (paid) Microsoft shill. He calls himself an IP pundit or something. Groklaw basically outed him before he owned up to being on Microsoft's payroll publicly. He is loyal to his employer but his analysis and projections are often contradicted by facts.