> Here's Atari Games v. Nintendo, so you can see what you think for yourself. But here's what I notice is not protected by copyright: > "Under the Act, society

> Here's Atari Games v. Nintendo, so you can see what you think for yourself. But here's what I notice is not protected by copyright: > "Under the Act, society is free to exploit facts, ideas, processes, or methods of operation in a copyrighted work. To protect processes or methods of operation, a creator must look to patent laws." > It's there in black and white that methods of operation are not protected by copyright. So what is Oracle thinking? Seems pretty clear to me!