3 ms·

So it's not actually the type inference that's the problem -- it's developers who carelessly define implicit conversion operators on their classes.

• JoeAltmaier 12y ago
  Strings have built-in conversion, right?
  • nanofortnight 12y ago
    The only built-in implicit conversions in C# are for numerics, and there isn't a loss in precision for those (with the exception of int/uint/long/ulong -> float and long/ulong -> double, where there is a loss of precision). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/y5b434w4.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/y5b434w4.aspx int i = "5"; would not work.
  • recursive 12y ago
    Not the kind you seem to be thinking of.