> However, does low resource usage necessarily imply lack of innovation regarding user experience? If you care about UX innovation, LXDE is not for you. That n

> However, does low resource usage necessarily imply lack of innovation regarding user experience? If you care about UX innovation, LXDE is not for you. That niche is filled by KDE 4, Gnome 3, and Unity. With XP support ending, I've used LXDE (Lubuntu) to rescue 2 old family machines that Gnome 3 and KDE couldn't handle without thrashing. How does the memory usage of LXQt Desktop compare to LXDE and Razor-qt? I hope they've managed to keep it down.