What a strange blog post. Contrarian for the sake of being so. Matt's first sentence sets the tone: he clearly harbors disdain for Tyson's "followers". I will

What a strange blog post. Contrarian for the sake of being so. Matt's first sentence sets the tone: he clearly harbors disdain for Tyson's "followers". I will admit that the recent aggression in the "science is truer than religion and any other study" argument is becoming obnoxious, and many who take it up aren't as enlightened as the company they attempt to put themselves in. That doesn't mean you can argue that scientific fact is not true. That is a faulty position to take. This post reads like an argument over one's favorite music. "Lady GaGa sucks, because I'm into prog rock!"