3 ms·
On the contrary, I'm glad they aren't throwing money at this. Throwing money at things sets a precedent; if they let things run as they are now, it's quite pos
by euank 12y ago
On the contrary, I'm glad they aren't throwing money at this.
Throwing money at things sets a precedent; if they let things run as they are now, it's quite possible that the bill will fail (like SOPA did) due to public outrage, not due to money.
The fact that politics is powered by money in the US is terrible, and the more exceptions there are to that, the better. I think this can set another precedent.
I think the big tech companies should only toss money in if the current efforts fail, as a matter of efficiency, morality, and precedent.
- mayneack 12y agoSure, I think throwing money at it is bad for the country as a whole, but I also don't want my interest group to unilaterally disarm. There has to be some other plan for carrot and stick to decide to not lobby.