3 ms·
>Contemptuous comments about bajillion-dollar valuations and hype don't provide any value to this discussion. The OP asked why the stock was down, and whether
by hnnewguy 12y ago
>Contemptuous comments about bajillion-dollar valuations and hype don't provide any value to this discussion.
The OP asked why the stock was down, and whether this was a buying opportunity. I offered perspective that it might not be, based on the analysis of someone respected in the field. I understand that DCF models can produce any numbers you wish (as does Prof. Damordaran; says so right in the article). But there's his model and there's his numbers, based mainly off assumptions that Tesla builds cars.
Tell me, what value did your comment add to the discussion?
If I sound "contemptuous", it's because the hype and fandom is tiring. Read the comments in this thread ("Tesla <3") or on Prof. Damodaran's article ("You can't vaue Tesla unless you've driven one!").
- marvin 12y agoMorgan Stanley's latest DCF arrived at $320/share, Goldman Sachs's arrived at $200, for instance. If your goal was to contribute by providing a contrarian view, that is fair enough and I might have misread the tone of your comment. I am merely pointing out that it is not just noveau riche kids and hype train riders who figure that Tesla is a good investment even at the current price - I figure that this is an interesting point, since my impression is that the financial press says the opposite.