4 ms·
Thank you! The article asks the question of which way should the car swerve, when physics indicates that attempting to alter course takes available tire fricti
by sounds 12y ago
Thank you!
The article asks the question of which way should the car swerve, when physics indicates that attempting to alter course takes available tire frictional force away from the braking maneuver.
Most modern roads are designed so that even if an oncoming car is suicidal, you can make some kind of defensive maneuver to prevent an accident. Not that it's impossible to have a no-win scenario, but the article makes it sound like autonomous vehicles will be getting in these kinds of accidents all the time.
The National Safety Council estimates the two leading causes of motor vehicle accidents in the US are:
~40% alcohol-related [1]
23% distracted driving [2]
There were 34,080 fatalities from motor vehicle accidents in 2012 [3]. If someone heading home from the bar could just get in the back seat and let the car take them home, late at night, wouldn't that be worth something?
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol-related_traffic_crashes_in_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol-related_traffic_crashes...
[2] http://www.nsc.org/safety_home/MotorVehicleSafety/Pages/MotorVehicleSafety.aspx#distracted%20driving http://www.nsc.org/safety_home/MotorVehicleSafety/Pages/Moto...
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in...
- stickfigure 12y agoPerhaps a minor point, but nevertheless: [1] explicitly points out that the 40% number is misleading and that alcohol-involved accidents should not be construed as alcohol-caused accidents.
- sounds 12y agoTrue. It's always going to be difficult to identify all the causes of an accident with the conflicts of interest. Just getting the 40% number was very difficult – number of fatalities with non-zero blood alcohol is easy to find but number of accidents with alcohol present gets political way too fast (which I find informative as the US starts to debate autonomous vehicles).