4 ms·
Totally agree, I read the letter from three and I've found it really annoying, maybe they wrote that for marketing.. I understand how they can feel but I don't
by genofon 12y ago
Totally agree, I read the letter from three and I've found it really annoying, maybe they wrote that for marketing.. I understand how they can feel but I don't understand how can someone have the courage to say that their game is better.. Million of people choose something else that's a pretty clear sign
- conanbatt 12y agoThey made a game with lots of effort in design, then put a price tag on it to make money off of it. Then someone else clones it makes it free. The pretty clear sign is that free stuff propagates way faster than paid stuff. Which is not a surprise at all.
- genofon 12y agoto me it seems that they are only motivated by bitterness and pride: 1) they assume that people who played 2048 or similar will not use their game. I think they could use 2048 for free advertisement, as they not the same thing, what's wrong about downloading two similar game? expecoially when one of them it's free 2) their game will not have nearly as many users as 2048, it's spread it's due simplicity, ui and design 3) They say their game is better (also) because it's more difficult to play: nonsense, games are not designed to be difficult but to be enjoiable 4) they knew someone will clone them, I think it's a risk to take into consideration I my opinion 2048 could only have boosted their sales, because it focused the attentions of millions of people with this sort of games. I would like to see the growth of the two compared