2 ms·
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Perhaps I can try to sum up my view (and what I think is the view of many other people on this thread): If you start fr
by scott_s 13y ago
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Perhaps I can try to sum up my view (and what I think is the view of many other people on this thread):
If you start from the premise that garbage collection is not an option in some circumstances, and you want to maintain memory safety, then I think you inevitably end up in a situation where programmers must make their memory access patterns explicit. Rust achieves this through its type system.
My guess is that you're disagreeing with the above premise.