3 ms·
I think case 2 is only for when you're doing joins, less likely but still possible.
by rubiquity 13y ago
I think case 2 is only for when you're doing joins, less likely but still possible.
- rosser 13y agoMy query for that case may also yield some false positives, as we appear to have a couple of cases where one table has a column that shares its name with a completely unrelated table.
- rubiquity 13y agoYup, I updated my reply above. You can get the list but then you still have to manually go through your codebase to make sure you aren't joining the table with the potentially dangerous column name with that exact table.