Yup, I know. I just got a little carried away :) My main point was similar to something you'd said earlier: > What we now know for absolute certain is that i

Yup, I know. I just got a little carried away :) My main point was similar to something you'd said earlier: > What we now know for absolute certain is that it's possible to write any kind of code without gotos (including awful code). I meant to point out the inverse, that it's possible to write good code even with gotos -- but it takes the same amount of care and diligence as writing good code in general. I don't mean to advocate the use of gotos, rather the elimination of the paranoia surrounding them.