3 ms·
Why not? It's just Unicode. At the risk of being downvoted for negativity, the calligraphy is nothing out of the ordinary. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/arabic http:
by theoh 13y ago
Why not? It's just Unicode. At the risk of being downvoted for negativity, the calligraphy is nothing out of the ordinary. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/arabic http://www.bbc.co.uk/arabic for example.
- rdl 13y agoI didn't mean Arabic script (which is pretty normal; there are about 4 letter forms per character, but it's only a small factor more complex than latin). I meant the actual practice of Arabic calligraphy, where they use it to make pictures which are usually specific to the text. e.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=arabic+calligraphy&tbm=isch https://www.google.com/search?q=arabic+calligraphy&tbm=isch This has about as much to do with normal Arabic script as the best illuminated manuscripts do with latin script.
- theoh 13y agoOh, OK. The images from that search do look like they would be difficult to automate, a lot of artistic judgement and creativity involved.