4 ms·
Original sources: http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/datasets/lbd.html http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/datasets/lbd.html http://www.census.gov/ces/
by candybar 12y ago
Original sources:
http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/datasets/lbd.html http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/datasets/lbd.html
http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/overview.html http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/overview.html
Methodology:
http://www.census.gov/ces/pdf/CES-WP-02-17.pdf http://www.census.gov/ces/pdf/CES-WP-02-17.pdf
Looking more carefully, I think the numbers tell a completely different story - this is not about the decline in entrepreneurship, but more about the rise of contingent workers and one-person businesses. Their definition of firm is a business that has paid employees and not all contingent workers count under that definition because they are often independent contractors or employees of a third party agency. The broader availability of all kinds of services from legal to insurance to accounting to technology to logistics to HR/staffing also allows 1-person businesses to handle more than they ever have, while potential legal and regulatory concerns have raised the cost of hiring the first employee. This is not about consolidation but bifurcation.
- digitalengineer 12y ago>more about the rise of contingent workers and one-person businesses. This is exactly what's happening in the Netherlands as well. Lot's of one-man companies. Our government is looking to stop the growth because of some tax dedications they can claim.
- stevesearer 12y agoI see the same thing in the circles of people I spend time with. Almost nobody is starting a business in the sense of having other employees. What people are starting are businesses that bring in some side revenue to help augment their regular incomes. What I find interesting about this is that because these are run on a shoestring budget, they end up being a testing ground for ideas that are actually profitable.