4 ms·
I think that's a bit past hyperbole, that's 200 end-to-end "wraps" per tape cartridge. A tape drive is (in theory) a LOT more durable, my drive has an official
by hga 13y ago
I think that's a bit past hyperbole, that's 200 end-to-end "wraps" per tape cartridge. A tape drive is (in theory) a LOT more durable, my drive has an official MTF of 250,000 hours at a 100% duty cycle.
That said, at least for my purposes, using one such SSD drive as a 5+ year "consumable" would work just fine, and the price for the Intel 335 is just fine.
(On the third hand, since all my system "disks" are LSI RAID 1 2 disk mirrors, I had all the infrastructure to add a 3rd drive, and I trusted Seagate enterprise SAS drives more than I trusted SSDs of that class 3 years ago (not that the latter were big and durable enough back then, unless perhaps you went to the $$$$$$ enterprise level of SSDs drives), I use the drive for some other backup systems, like sending my most important data to rsync.net using rsyncrypto, so I need some speedy disk to disk action. When I do a major system refresh in 2+ years I'll seriously consider SSDs, or if I have to replace my LTO-4 drive before then and need to seriously look at LTO-5 drives and media; I just passed the 2 LTO-4 tapes per monthly full backup threshold....)
- dragontamer 13y agoI remember prices just 3 years ago, and I can agree with you on that. SSDs just have advanced surprisingly far in these past couple of years. Be on the lookout for PCIe SSDs on your refresh! They might be ready by then.