3 ms·
The comment you replied to said that it "should" be possible to work more without being taxed more, not that it "is". So what's your point?
by eurleif 12y ago
The comment you replied to said that it "should" be possible to work more without being taxed more, not that it "is". So what's your point?
- zo1 12y agoI think you're just trying to be argumentative/pedantic for no reason that I can think of or immediately see. Besides, you took one interpretation of "should", and I took another; nothing wrong with both. So you can either choose to be pedantic and continue nitpicking, or you can admit you were wrong in accusing me of a logical fallacy, or bask in the glory that you just watched me make an actual fallacy (before my edit).