3 ms·
And that the deaths from illicit drugs were relatively low. It's the things you don't read about in the newspaper (not outrageous or tragic enough, just normal)
by keithpeter 13y ago
And that the deaths from illicit drugs were relatively low. It's the things you don't read about in the newspaper (not outrageous or tragic enough, just normal) that will get you.
- the_watcher 13y agoThat is actually a pretty interesting nugget that I missed on my first pass. I'm surprised that hasn't become a libertarian/anti-drug warrior rallying cry to convince those less moved by the "victimless crime" approach.
- keithpeter 13y agoI work as a teacher. Drug deaths are higher frequency in younger cohorts. Emotional impact much higher. Libertarians probably staying away from that one.
- the_watcher 13y agoThat's true, and again, something that more data like this can be really helpful with. I disagree that it will steer people away from this argument though, since "victimless crime" is alive and well, despite the very moving and personal response of "parents of the children who die are very much victims." Especially given that those who libertarians are trying to convince are generally technocrats, assuming they don't bother attempting to convince those arguing from morals.