3 ms·
Isn't this trivially defeated by deliberately running the CPU on Tor nodes at 100% all the time, pointlessly burning cycles if there's no traffic to pass? Obvi
by llama-made 13y ago
Isn't this trivially defeated by deliberately running the CPU on Tor nodes at 100% all the time, pointlessly burning cycles if there's no traffic to pass? Obviously there's a heat and power consumption consequence in doing that...
- tsaoutourpants 13y agoMine for Bitcoin with unused CPU cycles :)
- hrrsn 13y agoKind of impractical. Plus if you want to scale at any one point...
- Sanddancer 13y agoCould mitigate that with the heater job running at a nice level of 19 or so. Will keep the CPU under load, but server tasks will run with only a slight degradation.