4 ms·
This could be what we consider "cloaking" in the ad industry. Ads containing legitimate content are submitted, but when a user clicks it, a risk assessment is d
by CaveTech 12y ago
This could be what we consider "cloaking" in the ad industry. Ads containing legitimate content are submitted, but when a user clicks it, a risk assessment is done based on the users information (ip/location/js enabled/saving cookies etc).
If it's determined that you're unlikely to be a crawler or a person affiliated with the host site (google employee in this case) you're served a "Blackhat" ad, which is generally worded much more aggressively and against the TOS. High risk users are redirected to "Whitehat" pages which follow the TOS and generally don't attempt to actually convert a user. These high risk users are considered dead clicks.
A few years ago this was an insanely profitable industry on Google Adsense, but they've cracked down a lot. The new major space for this type of advertising? Facebook.
- rafaelm 12y agoFacebook cloaking is pretty huge right now. Even more so now that they've started cracking down hard on affiliate ads. Still, everyone knows that when you are cloaking it's just a matter of time before your account gets banned. FB is getting harder to cloak everyday. (Not that I do any advertising on FB, it's too stressful.)