I can't believe this is being upvoted so much. I have several issues here. 1. There's so little meat in this article about anything. 2. It treats the Gospe

I can't believe this is being upvoted so much. I have several issues here. 1. There's so little meat in this article about anything. 2. It treats the Gospel of Barnabas as a new and groundbreaking discovery that will challenge the faith and beliefs of religious people, while also claiming that it supports the Muslim version of events. What are they saying, that Muslims aren't religious? 3. The Gospel of Barnabas is not a new thing, has been analyzed to death, and is not considered to be high-quality source material by many high-profile scholars. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabas If it were any other topic, I bet it'd be flagged really easily. But there are a lot of people who just eat up anything anti-religious without using the same logical analysis that they would for any other topic. :(