3 ms·
So, did you read the article through to the end, because the solution is pretty elegant? Incidentally, the way plants get distributed is somewhat different from
by Tloewald 13y ago
So, did you read the article through to the end, because the solution is pretty elegant? Incidentally, the way plants get distributed is somewhat different from the way they distribute parts of themselves.
- Terr_ 13y ago> So, did you read the article through to the end, because the solution is pretty elegant? Yes, I read the entire thing (on my phone, even) before starting a reply... Why did you want to know? > Incidentally, the way plants get distributed is somewhat different from the way they distribute parts of themselves Certainly, but the OPs goal of "no repeated gaps along a line" only maps to one of those cases... AFAIK plants have no particular incentive to avoid the occasional line-segment as they compete for placement.
- Tloewald 13y agoIt seems like you were proposing a similar (i.e. Perturbed non-random) solution to what was eventually arrived at except that his solution directly derives from the goal.