3 ms·
tptacek is right. It's even worse, if you consider two-tiered pricing (ad supported, and paid), since advertisers want the expensive types who would pay for acc
by arjunnarayan 12y ago
tptacek is right. It's even worse, if you consider two-tiered pricing (ad supported, and paid), since advertisers want the expensive types who would pay for access, so they would pay less for the ad supported user group than you would think.
- 1337biz 12y agoBut you could find a way to work around that issue e.g. by offering certain features that are fee based and that are unrelated to advertising.
- the_watcher 12y agoTwitter could charge for something. They already do (ads). However, some advertisers will always pay more to reach those on a platform like Twitter, especially those who are likely wealthy, and those budgets are large enough to overwhelm whatever you would pay to avoid ads. If, however, you are simply arguing that Twitter should add some cool features that you have to pay for, then you are correct. They could, and may.