I'd call this consensus for consensus. You put your 'vote' in for a given outcome and the votes in aggregate are weighed to determine expected outcome probabil

I'd call this consensus for consensus. You put your 'vote' in for a given outcome and the votes in aggregate are weighed to determine expected outcome probabilities. By tying the vote/bet to a store of value (stored POW) you might eliminate vote fraud. I wonder what the effects of desired outcome manipulation by using large amounts of POW to vote? Ideally, you'd want 1:1 connections into the network by individuals.