4 ms·
If a washing machine uses less water and electricity but fails to actually clean clothes, in what sense is it efficient? Already that's happened to the top load
by bradleyjg 13y ago
If a washing machine uses less water and electricity but fails to actually clean clothes, in what sense is it efficient? Already that's happened to the top load market:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704662604576202212717670514 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405274870466260...
- chestnut-tree 13y agoInteresting...top-loading washing machines have never gained a foothold in the UK. Front-loading washing machines are the norm and always have been. Front-loading machines are perfectly capable of cleaning clothes, but sure there are some disadvantages compared to top-loaders: generally longer washing times, inability to add clothes once the wash cycle starts. I'm guessing that the high cost of front-loaders in the US is due to their low popularity?
- dazc 13y agoI remember top loaders being the norm - maybe 30 years or so ago but I am very old.
- otterley 13y agoI think this comment is misleading. In the article you're referring to, it's the more wasteful top-loaders whose performance got worse. The front-loaders which use less water and electricity worked just fine.