3 ms·

Sorry, but I think that example is so unrealistic as to not really be worth discussing.

• Pacabel 13y ago
  I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it. Maybe that exact situation won't often arise, but in other languages like C++, Java and C# it's not at all uncommon to have nested collections.
  • dbaupp 13y ago
    Yes sure; but it is rare to have indirection for every layer of a nested collection (i.e. each collection will essentially be a pointer to some data, with a little bit of metadata (like length & capacity for a Vec), so having Box<Vec<T>> is a pointer to a pointer to the data: essentially pointless!). In other words, one would write Vec<Vec<Vec<T>>> That might be considered ugly, but it's not ugliness caused by the `~` change.
    • Ygg2 13y ago
      Could the opposite happen? What if you have `~~` pointer or `~&~` pointer?
      • pcwalton 13y ago
        I've never seen `~~` except for workarounds caused by the current lack of dynamically sized types (which is being fixed). `~&` is not very useful, as you'd be placing a stack-bounded lifetime on the heap (except for 'static, I suppose, but I've never seen that).