> Explaining that the intent and attitude of the potential offender makes a huge difference (ie. Feld vs. hand in pants dude). _what???_ You think INTENT was

> Explaining that the intent and attitude of the potential offender makes a huge difference (ie. Feld vs. hand in pants dude). _what???_ You think INTENT was the difference between those two situations? You really don't see any inherent difference between using an expression that involves genitals but doesn't have anything to do with them and...sexually assaulting by forcing them to touch your genitals? The difference between those two examples had nothing to do with intent or attitude, but the actual action itself was explicitly malevolent in the latter case while accidentally offensive at worst in the former.