4 ms·
Ordinarily I'd vote this down for snark not contributing to the conversation, but I actually do this the underlying thought here is worthy and contributes to th
by softbuilder 12y ago
Ordinarily I'd vote this down for snark not contributing to the conversation, but I actually do this the underlying thought here is worthy and contributes to the conversation.
There is a core aspect of hacking/making/doing that Woz demonstrated well and aren't represented by many modern thought leaders in the industry.
- bmm6o 12y ago> Ordinarily I'd vote this down for snark not contributing to the conversation [...] You're right, it doesn't contribute to the conversation. > I actually do this the underlying thought here is worthy and contributes to the conversation Unless someone actually takes the "underlying thought" and expresses it as more than 12 words of snark, there's nothing to discuss.