3 ms·
This is exactly what I was waiting to see, great front-end, linked to a well thought-out and well-documented back end. Great work guys To elaborate a little mo
by hardwaresofton 13y ago
This is exactly what I was waiting to see, great front-end, linked to a well thought-out and well-documented back end. Great work guys
To elaborate a little more on what I think makes the front end "great": I think it's very simple. I contemplated making something like this simply because I think tools like nagios,etc are swiss army knives, BUT they look really ugly. I don't see why we can't have some beauty in monitoring.
I think that beauty, and function actually come together well in the interface as it stands now (I know it's not complete) -- I immediately understood where to look, what to click. While the everyday-user is not going to be unfamiliar with the interface, I also think an experienced user could benefit from having the clarity of a detail view, and individual machine view (the right and left respectively).
One place I can think of that might not be ideal for the kind of design is if you want to know aggregates/historical data of a certain data center/machine -- but I think this could easily be remedied by adding a stats page that is made to show that kind of broad data specifically (or even keep it out of the core codebase, and just have it be a very very popular plugin -- small tools ftw)