3 ms·
Good point. But I'll say that with React and ClojureScript you can make a very large code base where all the components manage their lifecycles in a way that is
by brucehauman 12y ago
Good point. But I'll say that with React and ClojureScript you can make a very large code base where all the components manage their lifecycles in a way that is completely reloadable with little effort going into thinking about reloadability itself :)
- derengel 12y agoAre you using react/cljs without using any of the Clojurescript wrappers? For learning purposes do you think is better to start that way?
- dkersten 12y agoI'm using Om quite heavily and it was my first look at react, clojurescript and single page web apps (prior Clojure experience though). Its been a reasonably pleasant experience and I can see myself continuing to use them quite a lot. Learned a lot about React in the he process too. I personally would stick with the wrappers as it makes for a more streamlined experience. I like Om though the others look a little simpler, so may be more suitable if you're looking to stay close to React.
- brucehauman 12y agoI am using Sablono https://github.com/r0man/sablono https://github.com/r0man/sablono a lot. It is a very thin wrapper around the basic react components. IMHO I would advise getting to know React before jumping into frameworks. It's a pretty simple model and incredibly powerful on its own. That being said I think Om is a wonderful framework. But its good to understand React outside of Om.