3 ms·
From a legal perspective, yes, there are more things to consider. From a common sense perspective, ZeniMax AFAIK wasn't even working on VR at this time period
by georgemcbay 13y ago
From a legal perspective, yes, there are more things to consider.
From a common sense perspective, ZeniMax AFAIK wasn't even working on VR at this time period other than Carmack dabbling in his own "free time", so this is a pretty naked attempt for them to make the claim that anything he worked on even remotely related to games is owned by them, which I have a huge issue with (even if it is a concept that holds legal water in some states).
I'd have more sympathy for ZeniMax if they were bullish on VR and Carmack was working on an official project for them in the VR space and then left for another company, but this doesn't look like that at all, this looks like a game company owned by a lawyer trying to get a big payday on an opportunity they previously missed the boat on, using tenuous legal technicalities.
- stonemetal 13y agoAs far as I know He is in Texas (Id is or was in Dallas). Does anyone know which way Texas leans on those issues? Either way DOOM 3 BFG was officially announced to support VR head sets, so he probably has worked with VR in some official capacity.
- sillysaurus3 13y agoIf Texas leans the wrong way, it must be challenged. It's ridiculous that Zenimax could possibly pull something like this with the full support of the law.
- sdgsdgsdg 13y agoThese are the ridiculous times we live in.