4 ms·
I did write a little bit about this in the comparisons page on the Mithril site ( http://lhorie.github.io/mithril/comparison.html http://lhorie.github.io/mithri
by lhorie 13y ago
I did write a little bit about this in the comparisons page on the Mithril site ( http://lhorie.github.io/mithril/comparison.html http://lhorie.github.io/mithril/comparison.html ) and I am actually writing an article about this topic (specifically, about lessons I learned from using Angular that apply to Mithril) that I'm planning on publishing this weekend over at the blog ( http://lhorie.github.io/mithril-blog http://lhorie.github.io/mithril-blog ). There's a feed you can subscribe to if you're interested.
There's also a reasonable amount of docs on the main site about the approaches that I do propose for various aspects of the MVC stack (e.g. see templating, components, etc).
I'm not saying more code is always necessarily bloat, but the correlation between code size and bloatedness does exist, whether you like it or not. I think what is ludicrous is to assume that all of the organically grown code over the years is somehow made up of only useful harmonious features.
Off the top of my head, I could immediately think of angular's directive system, and $scope as things that are probably far more complex than they should be, but these aren't exactly things you can "file an issue" for. So I did the next best thing and scratched my own itch.