5 ms·

> To be completely clear, Zenimax is claiming that John Carmack took software with him to Oculus VR that he developed while still an employee at id Software (ow

by wdewind 13y ago

> To be completely clear, Zenimax is claiming that John Carmack took software with him to Oculus VR that he developed while still an employee at id Software (owned by Zenimax). But: > ZeniMax provided necessary VR technology and other valuable assistance to Palmer Luckey and other Oculus employees in 2012 and 2013 to make the Oculus Rift a viable VR product, superior to other VR market offerings. My guess: it sounds like John Carmack began an informal relationship with Luckey and Oculus, and possibly wrote some code for or advised them while he was still at iD. If so, Zenimax is likely legally in the right. Yikes.

clavalle 13y ago
I find it hard to imagine that an industry veteran like Carmack would write code for another company while employed with another and proving some bit of proprietary advice was incorporated into the product would be difficult. My guess is that Zenimax wants to get access to the source to go on a fishing expedition.
- taiki 13y ago
  Not unprecedented though. Carmack did once advise Ken Silverman on using sectors with his 3D engine. Which later became the Build Engine.
  - z3phyr 13y ago
    Correct me, Build engine is 2.5D. Isn't it?
    - taiki 13y ago
      The exact nature of various FPS gaming engines from that era kind of gives me a massive headache. Still, the point stands that this isn't unprecedented. John Carmack's has, in the past, just helped out potential competitors before.
- angersock 13y ago
  Are you familiar with Carmack at all? Like, ever talked with him? He's friendly and is exactly the sort of engineer that helps teach others how to do things--just look at the GPL releases of all the old Quake stuff when it came out (back in the 90s!).
- stonemetal 13y ago
  It seems like Carmack produced Oculus demos of Id software before he left Id. May be he worked with the Oculus guys to support that effort and talked them into making changes to make those demos work. It would be rather unsurprising to me, close working relationships between game studios and hardware vendors (like graphics card, and console companies) happen all the time.
- justin66 13y ago
  > I find it hard to imagine that an industry veteran like Carmack would write code for another company while employed with another and proving some bit of proprietary advice was incorporated into the product would be difficult. Back in the day id programmers shared snippets of code with whoever they wanted - they didn't need to ask any corporate overseer for permission. There were a few little bits found when the GarageGames/Tribes engine code was first released, for example. (pretty sure they got those lines of code from Brian Hook, but it's been a long time...)
lawnchair_larry 13y ago
He was very openly employed by both companies at the same time. Eventually he left iD because they didn't like sharing him.
VikingCoder 13y ago
> provided That's the key word, isn't it. If the Oculus guys weren't absolutely clear about who owned what, and what the patents were, then they're screwed. By which I mean, they will for sure be embroiled in a long and costly legal battle, unless they settle.

by wdewind 13y ago

clavalle 13y ago

I find it hard to imagine that an industry veteran like Carmack would write code for another company while employed with another and proving some bit of proprietary advice was incorporated into the product would be difficult. My guess is that Zenimax wants to get access to the source to go on a fishing expedition.

taiki 13y ago
Not unprecedented though. Carmack did once advise Ken Silverman on using sectors with his 3D engine. Which later became the Build Engine.
- z3phyr 13y ago
  Correct me, Build engine is 2.5D. Isn't it?
  - taiki 13y ago
    The exact nature of various FPS gaming engines from that era kind of gives me a massive headache. Still, the point stands that this isn't unprecedented. John Carmack's has, in the past, just helped out potential competitors before.
angersock 13y ago
Are you familiar with Carmack at all? Like, ever talked with him? He's friendly and is exactly the sort of engineer that helps teach others how to do things--just look at the GPL releases of all the old Quake stuff when it came out (back in the 90s!).
stonemetal 13y ago
It seems like Carmack produced Oculus demos of Id software before he left Id. May be he worked with the Oculus guys to support that effort and talked them into making changes to make those demos work. It would be rather unsurprising to me, close working relationships between game studios and hardware vendors (like graphics card, and console companies) happen all the time.
justin66 13y ago
> I find it hard to imagine that an industry veteran like Carmack would write code for another company while employed with another and proving some bit of proprietary advice was incorporated into the product would be difficult. Back in the day id programmers shared snippets of code with whoever they wanted - they didn't need to ask any corporate overseer for permission. There were a few little bits found when the GarageGames/Tribes engine code was first released, for example. (pretty sure they got those lines of code from Brian Hook, but it's been a long time...)

lawnchair_larry 13y ago

He was very openly employed by both companies at the same time. Eventually he left iD because they didn't like sharing him.

VikingCoder 13y ago

> provided That's the key word, isn't it. If the Oculus guys weren't absolutely clear about who owned what, and what the patents were, then they're screwed. By which I mean, they will for sure be embroiled in a long and costly legal battle, unless they settle.