5 ms·
> ...his options strategies will make money in the worst year, they bleed money in all other years.... average returns count I'm not an expert in his line of t
by HelloMcFly 13y ago
> ...his options strategies will make money in the worst year, they bleed money in all other years.... average returns count
I'm not an expert in his line of thinking, nor do I currently practice his method of investing, but isn't his goal to hedge against loss (with potential for profit from it when it strikes others) rather than maximizing profits on the whole? I imagine he'd be upset that an "average" would be the ultimate indicator of the worth of his ideas.
Outside of the practical utility of his investment advice (which is outside of my interest area, for better or worse), I still think his work deserves one's attention and would not direct them away from NNT as you have. I'd probably skip the first book, and I've not read Antifragile yet, but it at least gives some probably needed context to the modern fixation on normally-distributed data as evidenced by the simplistic quantification of so many things (e.g., the Freakonomics podcast).
But he does speak like a man of dogma, something that always makes me wary.
- eli_gottlieb 13y ago>I've not read Antifragile yet, but it at least gives some probably needed context to the modern fixation on normally-distributed data as evidenced by the simplistic quantification of so many things (e.g., the Freakonomics podcast). If you want a man of dogma who's going to criticize the overuse of normal distributions to generate illusorily "informative" statistics, I think you'd be better off with E.T. Jaynes.
- HelloMcFly 13y agoI've read E.T. Jaynes. Also good, but way less approachable (or affordable, which matters for recommendations and for their relevance to the public). They scratch different itches for different audiences, even if their "enemy" is the same.