3 ms·

Opera: While there were times when Opera was a decent broswer (the pre-Mozilla Suite era), these days it can be a real pain to maintain support for Opera as it

Opera: While there were times when Opera was a decent broswer (the pre-Mozilla Suite era), these days it can be a real pain to maintain support for Opera as it has the tendency to do the dodgiest things at the most unexpected times and the small userbase just doesn't motive many web developers to work around these problems, hence offering it as an alternative to IE6 maybe isn't a very good idea as a considerably large amount of pages are broken in Opera. Safari: We're talking about IE6, so we have established that this is on Windows. Safari is a great browser but it's not a very great experience on Windows, the UI looks out-of-place, the fonts look weird (for users used to Windows font rendering), etc. I honestly don't think that it's a wise thing to suggest Safari for Windows users still using IE6, especially since the release of Google Chrome. (But I wouldn't hesitate to suggest it to anyone using OS X.)

lucumo 17y ago
> as a considerably large amount of pages are broken in Opera. Prove it.
- DrJokepu 17y ago
  Here you go: A Google search for "firefox compatibility" yields 3,840,000 results while Firefox having 47.9% "market share". Search for "chrome compatibility" yields 1,460,000 results while having 6.5% share. Search for "safari compatibility" yields 2,800,000 results while having 3.3% share. Search for "opera compatibility" yields 2,450,000 results, 2.1% share. I know that opera is the oldest participant in this list so it had more time to accumulate these results, but still, these (not at all scientific) numbers are highlighting that there are relatively more compatibility issues with opera than with other browsers.
  - lucumo 17y ago
    Not only the oldest participant, but also the only participant old enough to have been around during the IE monopoly. And then there's the people just parroting each other without any first-hand experience. This is not proof. This is not even an indication. You have yet to show a single (real) site where compatibility issues with Opera arise, let alone "a considerably large amount of pages".

lucumo 17y ago

> as a considerably large amount of pages are broken in Opera. Prove it.

DrJokepu 17y ago
Here you go: A Google search for "firefox compatibility" yields 3,840,000 results while Firefox having 47.9% "market share". Search for "chrome compatibility" yields 1,460,000 results while having 6.5% share. Search for "safari compatibility" yields 2,800,000 results while having 3.3% share. Search for "opera compatibility" yields 2,450,000 results, 2.1% share. I know that opera is the oldest participant in this list so it had more time to accumulate these results, but still, these (not at all scientific) numbers are highlighting that there are relatively more compatibility issues with opera than with other browsers.
- lucumo 17y ago
  Not only the oldest participant, but also the only participant old enough to have been around during the IE monopoly. And then there's the people just parroting each other without any first-hand experience. This is not proof. This is not even an indication. You have yet to show a single (real) site where compatibility issues with Opera arise, let alone "a considerably large amount of pages".