3 ms·
Oh bless us, it's the Hoax again. :( Set out to prove something reasonably obvious and straightforward (could you publish any old guff in Social Text at the tim
by leoc 13y ago
Oh bless us, it's the Hoax again. :( Set out to prove something reasonably obvious and straightforward (could you publish any old guff in Social Text at the time, even straightforward mathematical/scientific howlers? I'd bet my trousers on it), make a complete bags of doing so (if there's one time the editors of a social-science journal should feel reasonably happy accepting the physics content of an overview paper at face value it's when the author is a physics professor at a top-40 college publishing under his own name!), get praised and adulated forever after; for if Science teaches us anything, it is that it doesn't matter if your method is rubbish so long as you get the answer everyone wants and expects.
- steveklabnik 13y agoYup. Not to mention that Social Text isn't peer reviewed, and fake papers have made their way into _many_ different journals, including physics ones.