4 ms·
Oh yeah, it is "the best defense is a good offense" strategy... Wait what? It is ok to use them defensively (that is, pull them out if someone threatens to sue
by chrismcb 13y ago
Oh yeah, it is "the best defense is a good offense" strategy... Wait what? It is ok to use them defensively (that is, pull them out if someone threatens to sue you) But you can't use them for what they are actually intended for? That is for protecting your monopoly for a short period of time?
A patent holder doesn't "use patents for encouraging innovation" The government provides people with patents, to encourage innovation. But if you give me a patent, I don't have to run around using it to encourage others to innovate. What I can do, is make money on the item I already innovated. And maybe I'll have an incentive to innovate some more.
But to call someone a troll for using the patent that way it is intended to be used, because you don't like it, is just plain wrong.
- shmerl 13y ago> But you can't use them for what they are actually intended for? Patents aren't intended for racket and stifling innovation. > A patent holder doesn't "use patents for encouraging innovation" Oh, really? Then take a look at the patent law again, and the reason why limited time monopoly is given (as patents). If using a patent prevents and slows down innovation, it goes against the reason it was given in the first place and is usually a good indicator of patent trolling / aggression and otherwise abuse of the patent system, as well as indicator that patent system is broken (or not well tuned). I.e. normally patents shouldn't exist (monopoly is normally bad). But, they are granted to boost innovation. If results of patents usage is the opposite - something is wrong.