3 ms·
They should spend time to refactor their code, it's a mess: http://pastebin.com/a45dp3Q1 http://pastebin.com/a45dp3Q1 With that source is much harder to make a
by izietto 13y ago
They should spend time to refactor their code, it's a mess: http://pastebin.com/a45dp3Q1 http://pastebin.com/a45dp3Q1
With that source is much harder to make a security analysis and is easier to create side effects leading to security holes
- meowface 13y agoThat code was leaked in 2010 and is quite out of date. Since then they've updated their codebase quite a bit.
- moot 13y agoPer meowface's comment, this code is ~4 years old. It's in a much better place now, but there's still a lot of room for improvement. The vulnerability wasn't in the main application. I'll write more about it on my personal blog in the coming days (http://chrishateswriting.com http://chrishateswriting.com).
- hsx 13y agoHave you ever thought about re-writing 4chan and making it open source? I think a large portion of the community would be willing to contribute.
- thrillgore 13y agoIIRC they had open source code called Futabally, but as time went on they closed the sources to protect their interests. Projects like it exist, such as Kusaba X.